The US Government and American Psychiatrists Refuse To Recognize Cures In Their Victims

The problem in American psychiatry runs deeper than a consideration of the flawed nature of the discipline itself which is recognized by activist bodies internationally. What becomes just as serious a problem is the negative attitudes of the US government and the American psychiatrists themselves in dealing with the shortcomings inherent in the discipline of psychiatry. The US government and American psychiatrists claim they are well aware of Natural Mental Health Care interventions, and yet in practice and when they ruin people in swift civil court cases this has nothing to do with what they do. And the US government and American psychiatrists often claim they understand that there are no actual biological markers for their diagnoses and that they are therefore not certain if they are often accurate and yet once they hit someone with serious diagnostic labels such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorder they never let them off the hook in dealing with them. And the US government and American psychiatrists even report in some of their texts that in some cases they have seen complete cures from what they have labelled as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and yet on a daily basis people who were labelled with these disorders and who clearly have not suffered from them for years, meaning they never suffered from them in the first place or were cured, generally with a commitment to Natural Mental Health Care, are nevertheless dealt with like trash in society with enforced stigmatization, social isolation, and cruel blacklists associated with forced downhill socioeconomic drifts by the US government and American psychiatrists. Together they apprarently never even considered instituting an official window of recognized cures say as an oncologist does in dealing with cancer which due to positive attitudes associated with improvements in treatment plans by many doctors has often witnessed very high cure rates. And the American courts appear to not have set any precedents of taking civil mental health care cases back to court for review and a clearing of the records and an opening up of peoples lives and careers when these issues become apparent.